Monday, November 7, 2016

What I was thinking before election 2016

What I’m writing below is not really for anybody else to read.  I want it to remind myself of what I was thinking on the day before election day of 2016.

I judge Facebook friends based on the quality of the source of information they quote.  In earlier times, when someone tried to use evidence gleaned from a super market tabloid or fringe political publication I refused to listen and considered them to be irrational and/or misguided.  This hasn’t changed because of Facebook, but more and more people seem to think it’s OK to pass off nonsense or propaganda as proof of “whatever”.   If you do this, by all means feel free to continue the practice as it often can lead to chuckles or anger, but it will make it very difficult for me to be convinced of anything you say or write when you start to get serious.

I have disliked Donald Trump since the mid-80s.  My first discussion with a fellow college student, who had just read the Donald’s book, came about when he tried to convince me that DJT was a great role model because he became so successful.  My argument was that it was unfair to lavish such praise on a guy that was born into wealth and just continued his father’s business.  That’s not to take away from his accomplishments.  However, if you start in life with literally less than nothing, which includes debt from college, then it’s hard to see using DJT as your role model for how to succeed in life.  I only write this here as a memory… it’s not a reason for or against voting. 

I have never liked DJT’s style… his bragging and grotesque displays of wealth.  The very rich people that I knew when growing up didn’t talk about their money or show off what they had.  They didn’t have to.  If you saw them walking through a mall or down the street they looked like anybody else, possibly even a bit less dressed up as they saw no need to convince anyone of their standing in life.  I’m not sure why this bothers me so much.  But it does.  And I have no interest in deep-diving my psyche to figure it out.  But I don’t like his style.

There are three key factors about DJT that won’t allow me to vote for him.  First, his leader of the birther movement was enough to make me see exactly what kind of a political leader he would be… drawing conclusions with no evidence and/or leveling a charge at someone because it had the feeling like it could possibly be true.  I would have understood if this was a normal part of vetting before an election.  However, Trump did this after Obama had already been president for years and no evidence of his “unAmericanness” existed.  His only purpose was to raise doubt about a sitting US President, which I found to be extremely dangerous for this country.  Next, his lack of any experience working at any level of government is disqualifying.  Period.    Finally, his refusal to release tax returns makes it impossible for me to support him.  He will never release his tax returns because he is hiding things that would get him arrested and jailed.   He would spin paying no taxes into a positive.  He would probably even figure out how to spin a lack of charity similarly.  But he knows that there is information in there that would get him convicted, so we will never, ever, see his tax returns.  Even when the “audit” is complete.



Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Critical Thinking

I've been reading +The American Spectator lately in order to educate myself on what conservatives are saying.  I have found that this, as well as similar right wing media outlets (Fox, Rush, Sean H, etc....) are constantly trying to prove their point through the use of statistics.  In some cases, the stats are just wrong.  But even when they are right (or arguably right) the conclusions are incredibly suspect.

As an example, this is an article about how Obama is a Marxist (I know... again).  That conclusion is arrived to by citing statistics that show that the top 1% of Americans pay 39% of federal taxes although their national income was only 13%.  Coupling this with President Obama's statements about the rich not paying their fair share and that the rich don't need a tax cut, the conclusion is that he isn't just liberal, but a Marxist.

Let's play a little thought experiment.  Imagine a society of 100 people of which 1 makes $1 Million and 99 make $10,000 each.  Also, let's say that the cost of a very modest living is $9,500 per year.  Finally, assume the government requires $200,000 per year.  Now let's look at a few tax scenarios:

What would a flat tax look like?  Well each of the 100 individuals would have to pay $2,000 per year in taxes, which would severely hurt the livelihood of 99 people as they would be in a deficit of $1,500 per year.

Let's say we do it based on % of national income, which the author appears to think is the definition of fair.  In this case 99 people have to come up with $100,000 as does the millionaire.  Now the millionaire has a surplus of $900,000 and 99 people have deficits of $500.  This is fair?  

Finally, let's say that the Marxist Obama wants to make it so that 99 pay $500 per year, which would produce just under $50,000.  The millionaire has to now pay $150,000.  So there are no deficits among the 99 and the millionaire still has $850,000 in surplus.

 Does this sound like Marxism?  Only in the Twilight Zone.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Ron paul: Bailouts will lead to rough economic ride

"...governmental measures, combined with the Federal Reserve's loose monetary policy, led to an unsustainable housing boom. The key measure by which the Fed caused this boom was through the manipulation of interest rates, and the open market operations that accompany this lowering."

read more | digg story

Sunday, September 21, 2008

The Contrast: Barack Obama vs. John McCain

A video montage showing the two candidates' response to an AMERICAN crisis. Can you tell who is really serious about guiding America through this?

read more | digg story

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Administration Is Seeking $700 Billion for Wall Street Bailout - NYTimes.com

Administration Is Seeking $700 Billion for Wall Street Bailout - NYTimes.com: "A fourth, smaller group of lawmakers was highly critical and in some cases adamantly opposed to the plan. That group included including Senator Jim Bunning, Republican of Kentucky, and Senator Bernard Sanders, independent of Vermont.
The free market for all intents and purposes is dead in America,” Mr. Bunning declared on Friday. “The action proposed today by the Treasury Department will take away the free market and institute socialism in America. The American taxpayer has been misled throughout this economic crisis. The government on all fronts has failed the American people miserably.”"


So it seems to me that any "conservative" who was concerned about Obama's leftist socialist agenda should now be unopposed as we are already there. When does the government take over other failing institutions, like GM? This move makes the democrats look like right-wingers.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Hospitals, Airports, and Mr. Spock

While I wouldn't call it the highlight of my day, getting dad back and from the hospital was essentially what I did today to be productive.

While there, I noticed something odd. Hospitals and airports have something very important in common. In both cases, the system is setup up for the purpose of efficiently getting a large number of people (passengers or patients) organized to be serviced (Doctor or Pilot/Crew).

In both cases, as the client, your free will and decision making is marginalized so that the system can run more smooth. The end result is frustration on the part of individuals.

You have to show up very early for your flight and for the hospital. A 2.5 hour airtime flight from Newark to Miami really ends up taking 5 hours when you add the time to get to the airport, park the car, get through security, and then wait to take-off. When you get there, add time waiting for luggage. At the hospital, you have to get there early so that the nurses/staff can get you prepared and lined-up to see the doctor.

In both places, time feels like it has slowed to a crawl. Why? Because you are completely at the mercy of the system.

Not that anything can be done about this. At the end of the day, as Spock said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or in this case the one".

Dad gets his cataracts fixed (eye #1).


IMAGE_009.jpg
Originally uploaded by Zebadiah
This is dad just after his eye surgery.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Sleeping in Long Island

After working a day in Jersey City, I headed off to the far end of Long Island to help my dad prepare for, and get to, his surgery tomorrow. He is getting cataracts removed from one of his eyes.

The drive out here was terrible. It took about 4 hours with all the traffic. I got to test out two new techy gadgets. I listened to 3 chapters of a book I downloaded from Audible.com to my zune. I also installed Google Maps on my phone and was happy to find out that even though I don't have a GPS it does a pretty good job of figuring out about where I am.

Hasta La Vista.
This is a mobile.post

Most Husbands Nowadays, Have Stopped Beating Their Wives

HEINZ Tomoato Soup anyone?

read more | digg story

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

If Palin Were A Democrat...

Funny Comic if Palin was a Democrat.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul's take on the financial crisis.

I got nothing to say

7AM is not a good time to be trying to come up with something to write.

Today I am heading out to my customer, Pershing, in Jersey City. They want me to clear up some issues that have come out of user testing.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

I guess this is my first blog. Welcome to any and all who think this might be interesting. I'm not yet quite sure how this is going to fit into my life, but I guess we shall see.